Story consent for advocacy
Get consent for stories used in advocacy.
Higher-risk prompt — human review is required before you act on the output.
This prompt touches safeguarding, wellbeing, funding claims or public communications. Verify facts, remove personal details and check with a colleague before using the result.
When to use this prompt
Reach for this prompt when you need to get consent for stories used in advocacy. It's designed for Comms lead, Policy lead. Typically used within Communications work.
Not suitable for real-time decisions about individuals, safeguarding cases, or public claims without human sign-off.
How to use it
- 1
Gather your inputs
You'll need: Person, Uses.Nice to have: Support available. - 2
Fill in the template
Copy the template below and replace every bracketed placeholder with real, local context. Keep names and safeguarding details out. - 3
Run it in your AI tool
Paste into your preferred AI assistant. Ask a follow-up if the output misses your association's tone or context. - 4
Review with the checklist
Work through the human-review checklist below before you send, publish or act on the output.
Prefer a guided flow? Adapt with the guided builder — it fills placeholders from your association profile.
Prompt template
Design story consent for advocacy at {{association_name}}. Person: {{person}}. Cover specific uses, withdrawal, media risk, aftercare.Replace bracketed placeholders with real context. Never paste identifying details about children, health or safeguarding cases.
What good output looks like
A consent form and aftercare plan.
Human review checklist
Tick each before you send or publish the output.
Why this prompt works
Advocacy stories carry weight when consent extends beyond publication.
Was this useful?
Sign in to leave feedback and shape which prompts stay in the library.