Review a policy for clarity and completeness
Get a plain-language critique of an existing policy document.
This one needs human approval before use — got it?
High-risk prompt: touches sensitive areas. Always have a human review the output before you use it. How to use AI responsibly →
Fill in the details
1 placeholdersType your details in and we'll drop them into the template. Empty slots stay as tokens so nothing goes missing.
Prompt template
Review the policy below for: clarity, gaps, ambiguity, inclusivity of language, and alignment with YMCA values. Do not provide legal advice. Flag anything that appears to touch safeguarding, employment law, data protection, or child protection as requiring qualified human review. Policy: {{policy}}
Replace each highlighted placeholder with real context. Keep names and safeguarding details out.
Human review checklist
Tick each before you send or publish the output.
When to use this prompt
Reach for this prompt when you need to get a plain-language critique of an existing policy document. It's designed for CEO, HR lead, Trustee. Typically used within Governance work.
Not suitable for real-time decisions about individuals, safeguarding cases, or public claims without human sign-off.
How to use it
- 1
Gather your inputs
You'll need: Policy text, Policy purpose.Nice to have: Audience, Legal jurisdiction hints. - 2
Fill in the highlighted placeholders
Copy the template above and replace every highlighted placeholder with real, local context. - 3
Run it in your AI tool
Paste into your preferred AI assistant. Ask a follow-up if the output misses your association's tone. - 4
Work through the checklist
Tick every item before you send, publish or act on the output.
Why this prompt works
Explicitly telling the AI it is not a legal adviser and to route sensitive areas to humans keeps risk contained.
Related prompts
Was this useful?
Sign in to leave feedback and shape which prompts stay in the library.